Showing posts with label Lilith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lilith. Show all posts

Sunday, July 1, 2018

LUGH and LUCIFER



 Lugh - Lucifer Composed by Cindy Fleming – Raspotnik One more note to stir it - I never said that I didn't believe in "Lucifer"...It's just not in the way everyone else in the occult wants me to. "Lucifer" is a Christian corruption of Lugh, Champion of the Tuatha De Danaan, He who held the Spear, forged of the finest wood (Yew) which flew through the air (the East). 

The Sword was originally in the position of the south as it was forged by fire. These two were changed in the 12th century until recently when the truth came out. The spear of victory was also referred to as the spear of destiny. I adore Lugh (Lu) as himself – uncorrupted by the Holy Roman Empire...which fed the Christian religion - and the Pagan Lugh in origin fit the bad guy narrative as Paganism was “Satan” or the opposition of the Church..I will Never knowingly bow to a Christian construct to suit anyone.

 I do however understand that most who are now in the occult do venerate the corrupt version because they don't understand how these thieves took it, along with many other traditions of Paganism. First lets look at Lugh. Who is he? Lugh's father is Cian of Tuatha De Danann (the people f Anu) and his mother is Ethniu, daughter of Balor, of the Fomorians.

 He was also the foster son of the sea deity Manannán mac Lir Lugh and Lucifer - their names have the same root names. Words containing Lu, as in the word Lugh itself, or lo or le, have appeared for millennia always meaning light or sun or sun god. Luwian Apaliunas, Hurrian Aplu, Etruscan Apulu, Homeric Greek: Ἀπόλλων, that is λω, Latin Apollo.

 The form Apaliunas (]x-ap-pa-li-u-na-aš) is attested as a god of Wilusa in a treaty between Alaksandu of Wilusa interpreted as "Alexander of Ilios", and the Hittite great king Muwatalli II ca. 1280 BC. Luwian is closely related to Hittite, and was among the languages spoken during the second and first millennia BC by population groups in central Anatolia, Anatol ia (from Greek Aνατολή Anatolē—"East"; also Asia Minor. 

When the Illyrians migrated to Italy and founded Luceria in Apulia, a temple to Minerva was built. Minerva is the Etruscan and Roman equivalent of Athena. The arms (armament and weapons) of Diomedes given to him by Athena in the Trojan War were said to be were preserved in her temple. The Lusitanians (or Lusitani in Latin) were an Indo-European people living in the Western Iberian Peninsula Endovelicus was the most important God.

 António da Visitação Freire classified the name of "Endovelicus" as a mixed Celtic and Phoenician name, adapted to the Roman language. The "end-" radical would be from Celtic languages, "bel" (or "vel-") would be Phoenician for "lord", and "-cus" is a usual word termination in Latin. The name would suggest Bal, Bel, or Vel, the god Belenus (also Belenos) was a deity worshipped in Gaul, Britain, and Celtic areas of Austria and Spain. In the Roman period Belenus was identified with Apollo. Belisama has been claimed to be the consort of Belenus and she was identified with Minerva/Athena.

 It would seem that the word Lugh is related to every Indo-European language word meaning light. Lugh's mastery of all arts has led many to link him with the Gaulish god Lugus, Julius Caesar wrote much on this Deity, whom he identifies with Roman Mercury whom he describes as the "inventor of all the arts".Caesar describes Lugh, (Mercury Roman, Greek Hermes, Egyptian Thoth) as the most revered deity in Gaul, overseeing journeys and business transactions.

 Juliette Wood interprets Lugh's name as deriving from the Celtic root *lugios, "oath", and the Irish word Lugh connotes ideas of "blasphemy, cursing, lies, bond, joint, binding oath", which strengthens the identification with Mercury, who was, among other attributes, a god of contracts. Early Germanic peoples who later became the pagan Visigoths (followed the pagan Arian or Aryan ideals) referred to the Tuatha De Danaan as “Fallen Angels”, those who fell from the sky. . Colonia Copia Claudia Augusta Lugdunum (today is Lyon, France) was an important Roman city in Gaul.

 The city was founded in 43 BC by Lucius Munatius Plancus. It served as the capital of the Roman Province of Gallia Lugdunensis and was an important city in the western half of the Roman Empire for centuries. Two emperors,Claaudius and Caracalla, were born in Lugdunum.

 In the time period 69–192 AD the city population could be as large as 50,000 to 100,000. Even figures of up to 200,000 people are proposed by Albert Grenier. The original Roman city was situated west of the confluence of the Rhone and Saône, on the Fourviere heights. By the late centuries of the empire much of the population was located in the Saône River valley at the foot of Fourvière. 

The Roman city was founded as Colonia Copia Felix Munatia, a name invoking prosperity and the blessing of the gods. The city became increasingly referred to as Lugdunum (and occasionally Lugudunum) by the end of the 1st century AD. During the Middle Ages, Lugdunum was transformed to Lyon by natural sound change. Lugdunum is a Latinization of the Gaulish Lugudunon, meaning "Fortress (or hill) of (the god) Lugus" or, alternately "Fortress of the champion" (if lugus is a common noun cognate with Old Irish lug "warrior, hero, fighter"). The Celtic god Lugus was apparently popular in Ireland and Britain as is found in Medieval Irish Literature as Lug(h) and in medieval Welsh Literature as Lleu (also spelled Llew). 

According to Pseudo-Plutarch, Lugdunum takes its name from an otherwise unattested Gaulish word lugos, that he says means "raven" (κόρακα), and the Gaulish word for an eminence or high ground (τοπον έξέχοντα), dunon.

 An early folk stories of Gaulish Lugduno as "Desired Mountain" is recorded in a gloss in the 9th-century Endlicher's Glossary, but this may in fact reflect a native Frankish speaker's attempt at linking the first element of the name,Lugu - (which, by the time this gloss was composed, would have been pronounced lu'u, the -g- having become silent) with the similar-sounding Germanic word for "love", luβ. Another early medieval folk-etymology of the name, found in gloss on the Latin poet Juvenal, connects the element Lugu- to the Latin word for "light", lux (luci- in compounds) and translates the name as "Shining Hill" (lucidus mons) After the First Council of Nicaea there were other counsels that met in the early formulation of the Christian religion. First Council of Nicaea (325) First Council of Constantinople (381) First Council of Ephesus (431) Council of Chalcedon (451) Second Council of Constantinople (553) Third Council of Constantinople (680–681) Second Council of Nicaea (787) St Jerome was the the one who added the name “Lucifer” to replace the name “Satan” in 3 area's of the Christian bible.

 St Jerome was born Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus was born around 347 A.D. He was of Illyrian ancestry and his native tongue was the Illyrian dialect As a student in Rome, he engaged in the superficial escapades and homosexual behavior and lude sex acts of students there, which he indulged in quite casually , along with his many visits with willing females but for which he suffered terrible bouts of guilt afterwards. To appease his conscience, he would visit on Sundays the sepulchers of the martyrs and the Apostles in the catacombs. 

As a student in Rome, he engaged in the superficial escapades and homosexual behavior of students there, which he indulged in quite casually but for which he suffered terrible bouts of guilt afterwards. To appease his conscience, he would visit on Sundays the sepulchers of the martyrs and the Apostles in the catacombs. Leaving Rome is his early twenties he traveled to Gaul. As a young man, Jerome did not easily forget the delights of Rome and found himself homesick for a world of thought, study and discussion. However, he had a deep spiritual experience in a dream and was accused of being a “Ciceronian, not a Christian”. 

Since his solitude was disrupted by quarreling monks, he returned to Antioch in 378 where he heard Apollinaris the Younger speak. This experience influenced him to become a priest, but he remained free of a diocese. He returned to Rome after 12 years of living as somewhat of a hermit in Gaul. He was exposed to the legends of Pagan god Lugh who was still beloved of the people of Gaul during his stay in Gaul. All of his delights were accepted by the pagan way of life.

 Jerome wrote about a man named Lucifer (of Caliari) who is he? Lucifer (of Cagliari) first appears in history as an envoy from Pope Liberius to the Emperor Constantius II, requesting the convening of a church council. At the Council of Milan in 355, he defended Athanasius of Alexandria against Arian/Aryan attempts to secure his condemnation by Western bishops. It was reported that Constantius II, a supporter of Arian theology, confined Lucifer for three days in the Imperial Palace, where Lucifer continued to argue vehemently on behalf of Athanasius. 

Along with Eusebius of Vercelli and Dionysius of Milan, Lucifer was exiled for his opposition to the imperial ecclesiastical policy, which opposed the Nicaea creed. He was banished first to Germanicia, the see of Bishop Eudoxius, thereafter to Palestine and finally to the Thebaisin Egypt. While in exile, he wrote fiery pamphlets to the Emperor in which he proclaimed himself to be ready to suffer martyrdom for his beliefs. After the death of Constantius and the accession of Julian the Apostate, Lucifer and other expatriated bishops were allowed to return from exile in 361 or 362. 

However, he would not be reconciled to former Arians. He opposed the Bishop Meletius, who came to accept the Nicene Creed (and for that was driven out by Arians). Although Meletius had the support of many proponents of Nicene theology at Antioch, Lucifer put his support behind the Eustathian party which had unflinchingly stood by the Nicene Creed, and prolonged the schism between Meletians and Eustathians by consecrating without licence a Eustathian, Paulinus, as bishop. He subsequently returned to Cagliari where, according to Jerome, he died in 370. 

He may have been excommunicated as is hinted in the writings of Ambrose of Milan and Augustine of Hippo, as well as Jerome, who refers to his followers as Luciferians. There is extant a work known as Libellus precum, which was written by two Luciferian clergy called Faustinus and Marcellinus. Jerome discusses Lucifer and his supporters in his polemic Altercatio Luciferiani et orthodoxi ("Altercation of a Luciferian and an Orthodox"), as well as describing the bishop's career in De Viris Illustribus. All in all St Jerome was extremely influenced by pagan god and a man named Lucifer (of Cagliari) who was in opposition of the ideals of the Nicaea creed and who upheld the Arian's or Pagans of the time. It becomes easy to see where the formula of a beloved pagan god Lugh and the pagan accepting of the delights of a guilt-riddled man and a cult which was in opposition lead by a human man named Lucifer becomes advocacy to the early Christian religion. 

Jerome could never overcome his own guilt, but the indulgences and delights of the pagans and their Deity Lugh made it easy, but still Jerome seen himself as “fallen” from grace. The inner conflict of a man set the course of an advocacy the world to this day still uses. In the end question becomes, who are today's Luciferian's actually worshiping? Is it the corrupted version of Lugh or is a human man name Lucifer who started a cult who did worship the pagan god Lugh – or a combination of both as Jerome was influenced by both and he was the one who first added the name “Lucifer” to the Christian bible.

 Source 1. Olmsted, Garrett. The Gods of the Celts and the Indo-Europeans. University of Innsbruck, 1994. p.117 2. Monaghan, Patricia. The Encyclopedia of Celtic Mythology and Folklore. Infobase Publishing, 2004. pp.296-297 3. Ward, Alan (2011). The Myths of the Gods: Structures in Irish Mythology. p.13 4. Koch, John T. Celtic Culture: A Historical Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO, 2006. p.1200 5. MacNeill, Eoin. Duanaire Finn: The book of the Lays of Fionn. Irish Texts Society, 1953. p.205 6. Evans-Wentz, Walter (1911). The Fairy-Faith in Celtic Countries, p.369 7. Hull, Eleanor (1898). The Cuchullin Saga in Irish Literature. 8. Whitley Stokes (ed. & trans), "The Second Battle of Moytura", Revue Celtique12, 1891, p. 59 9. Lebor Gabála Érenn §59 10. Olmsted, Garrett. The Gods of the Celts and the Indo-Europeans. University of Innsbruck, 1994. p.117 11. John O'Donovan (ed. & trans.), Annala Rioghachta Éireann: Annals of the Kingdom of Ireland by the Four Masters Vol. 1, 1856, pp. 18–21, footnote S; T. W. Rolleston, Myths and Legends of the Celtic Race, 1911, pp. 109–112; Augusta, Lady Gregory, Gods and Fighting Men, 1094, pp. 27–29 12. According to the Dindsenchas Cú killed Cethen, and there once was a well-known phrase that "Thou hast acted for me Cú and Cethen." 13. https://www.ucd.ie/tlh/trans/ws.rc.15.001.t.text.html 14. "The Fate of the Children of Tuirenn", Tom Peete Cross & Clark Harris Slover (eds.), Ancient Irish Tales, Henry Holt & Co., 1936, pp. 49–81 15. Vernam Hull (ed. & Trans.), "Aided Meidbe: The Violent Death of Medb", Speculum v.13 issue 1. (Jan. 1938), pp. 52–61 16. James MacKillop, Dictionary of Celtic Mythology, Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 273 17. "Deirdre, or the Exile of the sons of Usnech" (ed. & trans. unknown) 18. MacKillop 1998, pp. 102–104, 272–273 19. "Lugh". bardmythologies.com. Retrieved 2017-08-01. 20. Stokes 1891, pp. 75–81 21. "The Fate of the Children of Tuirenn", Tom Peete Cross & Clark Harris Slover (eds.), Ancient Irish Tales, Henry Holt & Co., 1936, pp. 49–81 22. Stokes 1891, pp. 81–111 23. E. J. Gwynn (ed. & trans.), The Metrical Dindshenchas Vol 3, 1906, Poem 40: Carn Hui Neit 24. "John gives Celtic board game a new lease of life - Independent.ie". Independent.ie. Retrieved 2017-10-31. 25. E. J. Gwynn (ed. & trans.), The Metrical Dindshenchas Vol 3, 1906, Poem 5: Nás 26. http://www.maryjones.us/ctexts/dagda.html 27. "Cnú Deireóil - Oxford Reference". doi:10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095619885. 28. Monaghan, Patricia. The Encyclopedia of Celtic Mythology and Folklore. Infobase Publishing, 2004. pp.296-297 29. https://archive.org/stream/metricaldindsenc04royauoft/metricaldindsenc04royauoft_djvu.txt 30. http://www.ucc.ie/celt/published/T106500D/index.html 31. O'Curry tr., p.193, 192n "Scuabtuinné, that is, the Besom, or Sweeper of the Waves" 32. Vernam Hall ed.,tr., "The four jewels of the Tuatha Dé Danann," Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie 18 (1930) 73–89. "No battle was maintained against the spear of Lug or against him who had it in his hand," 33. Macalister, R. A. S., ed. tr., Lebor Gabála Érenn: The Book Of The Taking Of Ireland, Part IV (1941) [3] Lugh's spear is from Gorias in all three recensions (¶305, ¶315, ¶357). However, Hull's "Four Jewels" text swaps weapons between owners in the attached verse portion, making it Lug's sword that came from Gorias. Something similar happens in the verse invoked in Geoffrey Keating's History of Ireland, and in Comyn ed. tr., Lugh's sword is from Gorias, Lugh's spear is from Findias (Lugh becomes owner of both) 34. O'Curry, Eugene, ed. tr. "The Fate of the Children of Tuireann", The Atlantis IV, London 1863, 157–240. 35. O'Duffy, Richard J. ed. tr., Oidhe Chloinne Tuireann. The Fate of the Children of Tuireann. Society for the Preservation of the Irish Language, Dublin 1888 36. Joyce, P. W. (Patrick Weston), 1827–1914, tr. "The Fate of the Children of Turenn; or, The Quest for the Eric-Fine", Old Celtic Romances (3rd ed., 1907) (reprint 1920) 37. This tract was recapped by Hennessy, in his introduction, p.xiv, to his edition of Mesca Ulad. The tract occurs in the manuscript of TCD MS 1336 (olim H 3. 17) immediately after the h text of the Expulsion of the Déssi, Kuno Meyer, Anecdota, I, pp.15–24. 38. op. cit. ¶312, ¶312, ¶364 39. Gray, Elizabeth A. ed. tr., Cath Maige Tuired: the second battle of Mag Tuired ([Dublin]: Irish Texts Society [Series 52] 1982.), English 40. O'Curry, Eugene Manners and Customs II, 252. He translates 5 strophes from a poem from a vellum MS "formerly in the possession of Mr. W. Monck Mason, but lately sold at a public auction in London." 41. T. F. O'Rahilly, Early Irish History and Mythology (1946), pp.60–5 42. Charles Squire, Chapter 5 "The Gods of the Gaels" in The Mythology of the British Islands, 1905, republished as Celtic Myth and Legend, online at http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/celt/cml/ 43. Macalister ed., ¶319 (loc. cit.) 44. Stern, L. Chr. ed., tr. (into German), in: "Eine ossianische Ballade aus dem XII. Jahrhundert", Festschrift Whitley Stokes zum siebzigsten Geburtstage, 1900, pp. 7–12, edited from LL 207b 45. Wh. Stokes, Book of Lismore, fo. 153 b. recension of the ballad in the Notice on Festschrift above, in: Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie, III, p.432– 46. O'Curry, Eugene, "Tri Thruaighe na Scéalaigheachta (Three Sorrows of Storytelling)" The Atlantis III, London 1862, 396– 7. The four verses excerpted do not include the hound's name. 47. Alexei Kondratiev (1997), Lugus: the Many-Gifted Lord Archived 26 November 2010 at the Wayback Machine.. Retrieved 7 January 2006 48. Julius Caesar, Commentarii de Bello Gallico 6:17 49. Alexander McBain (1982), An Etymological Dictionary of the Irish LanguageSection 25. Retrieved 7 January 2006 Primary sources R.A.S. Macalister (ed.). Lebor Gabála Érenn [The Book of the Taking of Ireland]. Dublin: Irish Texts Society. Baile In Scáil, The Phantom's Trance Cath Maige Tuireadh, The (second) Battle of Magh Tuireadh Oidheadh Chlainne Tuireann, The Death of the Children of Tuireann Compert Con Culainn (Recension I), ed. A.G. van Hamel (1933). Compert Con Culainn and Other Stories. Mediaeval and Modern Irish Series 3. Dublin: DIAS. pp. 1–8. Kinsella, Thomas. The Táin, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969. ISBN 0-19-280373-5. Táin Bó Cuailnge, The Cattle Raid of Cooley Metrical Dindshenchas Secondary sources Cross, Tom Peete and Clark Harris Slover. Ancient Irish Tales, Henry Holt & Company, Inc., 1936. ISBN 1-56619-889-5. Ellis, Peter Berresford. Dictionary of Celtic Mythology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. ISBN 0-19-508961-8. MacKillop, James. Dictionary of Celtic Mythology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. ISBN 0-19-280120-1. Ovist, Krista L. The integration of Mercury and Lugus: Myth and history in late Iron Age and early Roman Gaul. Chicago: University of Chicago Divinity School dissertation, pp. 703, 2004. (link) Wood, Juliette. The Celts: Life, Myth, and Art. Thorsons Publishers, 2002. ISBN 0-00-764059-5. Lugh's Song, by T. Thorn Coyle, summarizes and recounts several of the myths about Lugh. "Lucifer (bishop of Cagliari)." Encyclopædia Britannica. Available online . Cross, F. L., and Elizabeth A. Livingstone. "Lucifer." Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (pp. 841). Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984. Source 1. MC GUIRE, M.R.P. "Lucifer of Cagliari." New Catholic Encyclopedia (Volume 8, pp. 1058). McGraw-Hill Co., New York, 1967. Copyright by The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 2. Schaff, Philip. "Principal Works of St. Jerome." Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church (Volume VI, pp. 319). Second Series. Christian Literature Publishing Co., New York, 1892. Available online through The Christian Classics Ethereal Library. 3. LECLERCQ, H. "Lucifer of Cagliari." Catholic Encyclopedia (Volume IX, pp. 410). Robert Appleton Company. New York, 1907. Available online <"Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-12-24. Retrieved 2013-12-28.>. 4. Jerome, Chron. Ol. CCLXXXVII 2 5. "NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome - Christian Classics Ethereal Library". www.ccel.org. Retrieved 2016-10-18. 6. Butler, Alban, Butler's Lives of The Saints, "St. Athanasius" 7. Butler, Alban, Butler's Lives of The Saints, "St. Jerom" 8. T. Gilmartin, Manual of Church History, Vol.1, Ch XVII, 1890 9. John Henry Blunt, Dictionary of Sects, Heresies, Ecclesiastical Parties, and Schools of Religious Thought (1874), p. 263. 10. A Jacobite Gazetteer - Cagliari, Sardinia 11. BENIGNI, U. "Cagliari, Archdiocese of." Catholic Encyclopedia (Volume III, pp. 139). Robert Appleton Company. 


Created and Researched by Cindy Raspotnik
www.ancientchurchofgod.com   COPYRIGHT 2018 DIGITAL REGISTERED 
Reposting 

Friday, June 15, 2018

Satan IS Lucifer But ONLY on Social Media!


Foolhardy in Satanism
Ancient Church of God

Every day on Social Media, this topic comes up, and time and time again I see people who can't seem to read historical studies enough to provide this answer, and the minute you correct them they circle you and explain things its all based on one's perception, this is as far from the truth as you can ever be!
Who is Satan or is he Lucifer?
Well, I am embarrassed to see people calling themselves Theistic Satanist's answer this question as the same person, and Satan would be embarrassed as you call him a “Fallen Angel!” or a Christian Leader!
Please, people there are multiple resources out there to explore the differences. I sometimes think these people are trying to scam people, or they are the people that just like things and never read them fully, or they are “high school” dropouts! I am glad I have surrounded myself with people who know Lucifer was created by Christianity and Satan was rooted in Hebrew Lore, and Lucifer never appears in any book written by the Hebrews.
I repeat no Hebrew explains Lucifer, and you can dust off all the books that are written by self-publishers you want and they are wrong! Calling Satan, Lucifer is like calling Leviathan a female who had sex with Satan!
People are not devoted enough to the path, and worse yet they are teaching new people, their ignorant information. I am beginning to think its a shame it is not thousands of years ago so we could just plain march all these Lucifer Lovers to a cliff, and shove them off! And this playground mentality displayed when you correct them is nothing short of self-victimization!
I can say these people are taught incorrectly, and yes you can change to make it better, without “safe spaces!” YOU CAN READ! But select the historical authors instead of the New Age Authors, who seem to want to write and dream of Bentley's and Red Carpet, neither will they ever see!
I managed to gather over twenty titles and am going to have my own “Book Burning!”
I am going to disgrace Lucifer in the Name of Satan! Why because I can and I am going to keep buying books about Lucifer burning them in disrespect, not to the fictitious Lucifer and I mean fictitious God, so many like to keep bringing up like some Reddit Troll gone crazy!
I guess I should also expect, that some people can't let go of the Christianity, and can't seem to read, or perhaps they are just plain low I.Q.?
Again nowhere in Hebrew Ancient Literature does Lucifer connect to Satan!
They are so separate God actually speaks to Satan in Hebrew Literature, he never speaks to Satan whatsoever, so what makes you think they are friends, I have even seen literature which reeks of pornography speak of Satan and Lucifer having a good old “gang-bang!”
The ignorance is oozing off these people who are telling people they are the same, and I would as a prospective member of any group or organization question, why is the leader of the group even selling this, unless its to bring in membership to scam them, or sell them more false books!
Every so often groups form in unification processes that fail rather quickly embracing Satan and the Lucifer as the same and to be honest they are nothing more than an effort to gather people who are ill-educated since all people who have any formalized education on the Occult or Satanism, know this simple fact that Lucifer was a Christian Construct and Satan was Hebrew, I also marvel at the people who attempt to explain their way out of this.
Exposing foolishness makes people very angry and once exposed it seems they are far to embarrassed to admit they are wrong and make a statement to their membership, of such a mistake! We currently see this where one person has created a church that claims Tiamat is Satan, and historical data proves them very wrong, and they continue to “spin” over and over because they said Satan is a Female! We know simply by researched historical data, that Tiamat was female and had zero to do with anything Satan even this goes as far, as acceptance of Tiamat as a Goddess would also accept the stories of her, and she was killed by Marduk the Son of Enki, and I did not make this up, for those laughing reading this.
Someone again was educated wrong, the same people who are teaching people wrong are ganging up on those of us, who researched and who read historical data, including many texts easily researched by looking up them on Wikipedia, or using a University Database.

And do not tell them they are wrong, acting like a fourth grader, they “spin” and attack those people who are trying to help them! This is because you are changing peoples minds in the Cult Group they are forming or have formed!

I also have seen these same people make grandiose claims where they operate offline talking about the falsehoods, they write on Social Media when in truth none of them have churches beyond some tiny and dank apartments somewhere in rural America. These people will fight the hardest, since they cannot meet people, and discuss the truths and the academics are out their league to even talk too.

Satan is not Lucifer!
I would love to debate this with anyone!
Thanks!

Tom Erik Raspotnik   

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

THE WORST BOOK EVER WRITTEN ON THEISTIC SATANISM


The Worst Book Ever Written in the Occult
By Tom Erik Raspotnik

Occult Literature has reached it all-time low, with this being written down by a mentally ill Satanist who dares call himself leadership material. This same individual has stalked almost every group, church or organization on the internet, pleading for someone to listen to him.
In his own words in his first book:
All child molesters should be forced to have sex with farm animals, and have fruits and vegetables inserted into their anus, and be forced to eat from one another prisoners ass, after several days of bizarre torture they are to be impaled by a giant penis statue! It sounds like a fantasy of sick and deranged individual.
Also, this same self-proclaimed leader is quoted he has a desire to destroy churches, by political means, since when does that mix! When a madman becomes delusional. And remember all of this came from Satan direct by a vision to this psychopath.
This same author claims to lucid dream, and recommends burning the scent of Opium and remains awake, yet he has had sex with demon creatures in his dreams, both male and female.
Many of his prophecies which wrote in his small self-published book are read like a Charlie Manson manuscript and will make the reader wonder if a suicide countdown is near.

Sex in dreams with demonic creatures is often a symptom of serious mental duress. He goes on to tell us the Antichrist has risen (a Christian and Muslim Concept) and appears on paper. All people who are wealthy will be destroyed by Satan according to this Disability Recipient will all perish.
He carries on about black painted walls, yet in numerous photos of his ghetto apartment shows no black walls or anything but sixties decor. Blue flames jumping out, Roman Gladiators showing up, along with Red Sonja showing up and giving him a black book of Satan. This get better and better making this a cold hard science fiction novel indeed.

Urination and burnt Bibles and the author claims to possess a secret Black Book Red Sonja gave him, and he goes from HE to SHE with Tiamat claiming a female Dragon is Satan, yet in his book he exclaims he is a male.
Then he rambles on changing Satan and proudly hailing the Christianity made Lucifer claiming all Satanist's need to worship Lucifer and then without warning he says Satan creates Leviathan and calls HE a SHE, obviously an identity problem and then goes on that Leviathan who he claims is a female has sex with Satan. Satan has sex and waits a few weeks and on the six hundredth day of the sixth month, on the sixth day he loses days, and calendar days I suspect this is from his record of being a High School “drop out!”

He also goes onto explain Satan LAYS OVER THE GREAT MOUNTAIN CALLED Iraq! Guess he failed geography class, and geology both. Then he describes Satan having a giant penis! And the FEMALE in his story which is actually a MALE Leviathan is gang banged by Satan and Lucifer going on to create a mad sex story nothing short of coming from a deranged person.

Leviathan a MALE gives birth to Lilith and Adam and they were twins, and the two twins have an incest affair, which includes the touching and feeling where he goes on to explain where the hot juice comes out and explains Lilith fondles Adam jerking him off in her face, or breasts like an XXX movie.
This chapter alone is so detailed you could buy his book for the porn references if you were as mad at him.

He goes on to explain how Adam slams Lilith as Adam was birthed with pornography skills. No apples, or even pomegranates? Satan then came them and told them they were not prepared to raise a child, so Satan before she could have her child, he whisked it off to Hell (remember that imaginary place designed by Christianity) this yes is from a self-proclaimed Leader of Theistic Satanist.

While the baby was off being raised by Satan, Adam finds Eve which he describes like Dolly Parton.
Again fingering, and pornography moves he ties Eve up with vines and went on licking her ass, yet the writer continues to describe anal, not vaginal! Soap Opera?

What happened with Leviathan? Who knows its pages and pages of sexual fantasy making this writer works even more fantasy and science fiction. His fantasy goes on for paragraph after paragraph about fruit fantasies and ejaculation tasting.

In his story, Lilith encounters Eve and smells Adams ejaculation on Lilith and then a lesbian story erupts out of the entire mess. It is crazy beyond imagination.
What was Satan up to? Taking Classes in Hell about raising a Baby which was from a Man Leviathan.

2026 years ago, in small Middle Eastern Town lived a whore named Mary, he goes on. She is the local prostitute who seems to have eyes from women. He goes on to portray his fantasy of bestiality as he describes, goat and horse sex. And how this town mixed with the animals. Blood and ejaculation and raw vaginas bleeding all come into the next paragraphs.

Mary MISSPELLED MARRY is hanging out with Joseph in this badly written chapter which is challenging to read at best. Jesus is described as he moves to Iraq, to hang out with his friends.
Ages and places are all astray and then out of nowhere his book moves to himself and describes after this brief misguided Christian based lesson his thoughts of Satan and Lilith being married.

He then goes on to explain the basic methodology, including Lucifer all the while explaining he is a Theistic Satanist. Again it becomes barely readable, and because he has such a limited knowledge of magic, he rambles on with Leviathan being a Crown Ruler of Hell an equal to Satan. Which to a Jew may be something informational but again Leviathan is a woman in the book, not a man as described.

The book ends with pacts and simplistic left-hand path mutterings which include selling your soul by contract, and this is something he never used since he still remains on Social Security Disability.
This book has absolutely ZERO to do with Theistic Satanism!

Are you done laughing yet?
Church of FEMALE LEVIATHAN is enough for Jew's everywhere to laugh! 
Lucifer and Satan gangbanging her is even worse and then Lillith too!
Crazy people in the Self Publishing World!


V.K. Christian Occultist

https://vkjehannum.wordpress.com/ V.K. Jehannum the Occultist with Christ https://vkjehannum.wordpress.com/about/ I recen...